Microplastics pollution in the ocean: Potential carrier of resistant bacteria and resistance genes.

Microplastics pollution in marine environments is concerning. Microplastics persist and accumulate in various sections of the ocean where they present opportunity for micropollutant accumulation and microbial colonisation. Even though biofilm formation on plastics was first reported in the 1970's, it is only in recent years were plastic associated biofilms have gained research attention. Plastic surfaces pose a problem as they are a niche ready for colonisation by diverse biofilm assemblages, composed of specific bacterial communities and putative pathogens prone to acquiring ARGs and resistance in the biofilm. However, the nature of antibiotic resistance on aquatic plastic debris is not yet fully understood and remains a concern. Given the inevitable increase of plastic production and waste generation, microplastics released into the environment may prove to be problematic. This review explores microplastic waste in the ocean and possible concerns that may arise from the presence of microplastics in conjunction with favourable conditions for the development and dispersal of antibiotic resistance in the ocean and food web.

Immunologically nonspecific mechanisms of tissue destruction in the rejection of skin grafts.

When mice are lethally irradiated and reconstituted with allogeneic bone marrow cells, their skin is repopulated over a period of several months with Langerhans cells (LC) of marrow donor origin. Skin from such mice, when transplanted to unirradiated syngeneic recipients, became in many cases the sites of intense inflammatory responses that led to varying degrees of destruction of the transplanted skin and in some instances, to rejection of the entire graft. The frequency and intensity of these responses were influenced by the nature of the immunogenetic disparity between the donors and recipients of the marrow cells. Chimeric skin placed on hybrid mice derived from crosses between the marrow donors and recipients behaved in all respects as syngeneic grafts or autografts. When the recipients of the chimeric skin were presensitized to the antigens of the marrow donor, the responses were especially intense, and resulted in all cases in complete rejection. Thus the immunologically mediated attack on the allogeneic LCs was accompanied by widespread and nonspecific destruction of bystander cells. In all cases, the inflammation and tissue damage were confined sharply to the grafted skin, showing clearly that nonspecific or indirect tissue destruction is entirely consistent with highly selective destruction of grafted tissues. This finding removes a major objection to postulated mechanisms of rejection that involve indirect destruction of grafted tissues.